www.alfonsotoscano.it la musica degli ignoranti

Calendario   |   Corsi, seminari e stage   |   Libri, cd, demo   |   archivio audiovideo   |   la chitarra battente   |   mostra   |   annunci   |   la chiazza    |   proposte artistiche     artigiani & hobbisti    |   i portatori della tradizione    |    eventi trascorsi   |   le feste da non perdere   |   articoli   |   Cilento   | nonSoloMusica   |   home   |   la battente vista da..


in questa piazza puoi dire quello che vuoi senza bisogno di registrazione/iscrizione, qui ci si incontra per fare quattro chiacchiere oppure per spaccare il pelo in quattro, come preferisci...

resta inteso che se ti metti a rompere le scatole i tuoi interventi verranno cancellati senza pietŕ, e questo vale in particolar modo per coloro che scelgono di rimanere anonimi pur usando uno pseudonimo    

Torna all'elenco argomenti | Messaggi | Martedi 22 Gennaio 2019

Nuovo oggetto


Usa gli Smileys Inserisci un'immagine

Vengo da:

Inserisci la parola che leggi qui sopra prima di inviare:
Stai rispondendo al messaggio di: Avvocatista
[15-01-2008, a  20:10]
Re: Costruttori di flauti di canna.

Qui trovati il sw, e questo formulario credo possa esserti utile.

Basic Calculations for Flute Making

These were recommended by Peter Hoekje (Hoekje@uni.edu) on the newsgroup rec.music.makers.builders.

Below is a medium length description of the details; the reader is advised
to skip it if you're not interested.

There are a few important physical quantities you need to
keep in mind. First, let's define some measurements:
2a = bore diameter in the vicinity of the hole
2b = hole diameter
2s = hole spacing (e.g. from this hole to the next open hole)
t = physical length of hole, e.g. thickness of wood
te = effective acoustical length of open hole, approx. te=t + 1.5b
x1 = distance, in a conical bore, from the hole to the hypothetical
apex of the cone.

Benade defined some length corrections for various cases, and I will
list these below. These length corrections describe flattening effects
which must be subtracted from each hole's idealized position (measuring
from the mouthpiece end).

First, if only one hole is open, then define D as the distance from
the center of this hole to the open end of the bore. The effective
bore is not perfectly open at the hole, but appears to extend beyond
the hole by a distance Cs ("s" for single hole)
Cs = ----------------------------
(2b/2a)^2 + te*(1/D + 1/x1)

If the topmost open hole is followed by at least one more open hole,
then the bore from the open hole downward can be usefully represented
as a semi-infinite lattice constructed of similar holes and bore.
The open-hole lattice correction, Co, is

Co = 2s * (0.5) *

But, if there are any closed holes _north_ of the first open hole
(i.e. in the main bore before the first open hole), they also provide
a flattening effect. Each closed hole adds the correction Cc

Cc = (0.25) t (2b/2a)^2

Another very important physical quantity is the "cutoff frequency" fc.
This marks the boundary between low frequencies, which are reflected
by the tone holes back into the instrument to form strong resonances,
and high frequencies which leak freely out through the tone hole row.
The cutoff frequency also marks the division between the low-frequency
isotropic radiation pattern (energy radiates in all directions equally)
and the high frequency directional radiation patterns.

Anyway, fc can be estimated by
c 2b 1
fc = --- * -- * -----------
2pi 2a (te*2s)^0.5

_IF_ this expression is evaluated for all the tone holes and the numbers
are consistent across the instrument, _THEN_ this is a useful
Virtually all reasonable musical instruments with tone holes share this

So, if for example one were going to design an instrument from scratch,
here's a sketch of the process:

1. Calculate the ideal lengths of the bore for each note, assuming no
holes and the bore were going to be cut off clean (and no end effects)
2. Choose a cutoff frequency (fc=1500 Hz is a good start for treble
instruments; it scales pretty well with the base pitch of the
3. Choose tone hole sizes (2b) and spacings (2s) which are manageable
by the hands of the player, consistent with fc.
4. From the bottom of the instrument, working up, apply the corrections
for each hole relative to the ideal lengths, starting with Cs for the
first hole and then Co after that.
5. Now you pretty much know the rough layout, so now calculate the closed
hole corrections, adding up the effects for all the closed holes for
each fingering.
6. Now repeat steps 4 and 5 until you don't get much change from one
iteration to the next.
This works quite nicely on a spreadsheet, for example.

Good luck. Feel free to drop me a
line if you have any questions. Hoekje@uni.edu

Il forum del sito della chitarra battente ©ZIXForum 1.14 by: ZixCom 2006Up